Combined Oral Contraceptive Use and the Risk of Cervical Cancer: Literature Review / Uso de anticoncepcional oral combinado e o risco de câncer cervical: Revisão da literatura

Abstract Cervical cancer (CC) is caused by persistent infection of human papillomavirus of high oncogenic risk (hr-HPV); however, several cofactors are important in its carcinogenesis, such as smoking, multiparity, and prolonged use of oral hormonal contraceptives (COCs). Worldwide, 16% of women use COCs, whereas in Brazil this rate is of ~ 30%. The safety and adverse effects of COCs are widely discussed in the literature, including the increase in carcinogenic risk. Due to the existence of several drugs, combinations, and dosages of COCs, it is hard to have uniform information in epidemiological studies. Our objective was to perform a narrative review on the role of COCs use in the carcinogenesis of cervical cancer. Several populational studies have suggested an increase in the incidence of cervical cancer for those who have used COCs for > 5 years, but other available studies reach controversial and contradictory results regarding the action of COCs in the development of CC.

Resumo O câncer cervical (CC) é causado pela infecção persistente pelo papilomavírus humano de alto risco oncogênico (hr-HPV); entretanto, vários cofatores são importantes na sua carcinogênese, como tabagismo, multiparidade e uso prolongado de contraceptivos hormonais orais (COCs). No mundo, 16% das mulheres usam AOCs, enquanto no Brasil essa taxa é de ~ 30%. A segurança e os efeitos adversos dos COCs são amplamente discutidos na literatura, incluindo o aumento do risco carcinogênico. Devido à existência de várias drogas, combinações e dosagens de COCs, é difícil ter informações uniformes em estudos epidemiológicos. Nosso objetivo foi realizar uma revisão narrativa sobre o papel do uso de COCs na carcinogênese do câncer cervical. Vários estudos populacionais têm sugerido aumento da incidência de câncer de colo uterino para aquelas que usam COCs há mais de 5 anos, mas outros estudos disponíveis chegam a resultados controversos e contraditórios quanto à ação dos COCs no desenvolvimento do CCU.

Less-than-subtotal parathyroidectomy as treatment for primary hyperparathyroidism in multiple endocrine neoplasiatype 1: a good option?

Introduction: Multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 (MEN1) is a genetic syndrome manifested initially as primary hyperparathyroidism (HPT/MEN 1). The treatment is classically surgical with total parathyroidectomy with autograft or subtotal parathyroidectomy. In order to maintain normal postoperative function, less than subtotal parathyroidectomy (LTSPTx) has been suggested as an alternative technique. Objective: Analyse critically LTSPTx as a treatment option for patients with HPT/MEN 1. Methods: A retrospective cohort study of patients submitted to LTSPTx from january 2011 to december 2018. Data from demographics, laboratory tests, 6 months postoperative clinical outcomes, intraoperative PTH values and localization studies were analized. Results: LTSPTx was performed non-intentionally in 13 patients and intentionally in 13 other cases; 17 females and 9 males. The mean age was 44 years, but in patients with identified mutation it was 37 years. Seventeen patients (65.4%) had normal parathyroid function, 5 (19.2%) had hypoparathyroidism, in all of them LTSPTx was performed non intentionally. Four patients (15.4%) had persistence, all submitted intentionally to LTSPTx. The mean intraoperative PTH drop was 85.5% (±10.4%), without difference intergroup. A patient with persistence had PTH intraoperative drop > 80%, which also occurred in another patient with postoperative hypoparathyroidism. No persistence was found in patients with concordant image exams, what happened in three cases with non-concordant studies. Conclusion: LTSPTx may be intentionally performed as treatment for HPT/MEN 1, however social aspects, technical expertise, image exams and patient expectations must be taken into account.

Lesão renal aguda em pacientes em uso de inibidor da enzima conversora de angiotensina para tratar insuficiência cardíaca descompensada / Acute kidney injury in patients using angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors to treat decompensated heart failure

JUSTIFICATIVA E OBJETIVO: Esse estudo procurou descrevera incidência de lesão renal aguda (LRA) em pacientes com insuficiência cardíaca (IC) descompensada pós uso de inibidor de enzima conversora de angiotensina (IECA) e o perfil clínico-epidemiológico desses pacientes. MÉTODOS: Trata-se de um estudo de coorte prospectiva. Foram incluídos no estudo pacientes com insuficiência cardíaca classe IV segundo critérios doNew York Heart Association (NYHA) descompensada admitidos nas enfermarias de Clínica Médica do Hospital Santo Antônio no período de 01/03/2011 a 30/10/2012. Foram excluídos pacientescom doença renal crônica estágios III, IV, V e com dados incompletos. A lesão renal aguda foi definida de acordo como critério RIFLE (Risk/Injury/Failure/Loss/End-stage). Os dados foram analisados através do programa estatístico SPSS 14.0.Esse projeto foi aprovado pelo Comitê de Ética e Pesquisa do Hospital Santo Antônio. RESULTADOS: Dos 100 pacientes estudados, a maioria era do sexo masculino, de etnia afrodescendentee apresentavam como etiologia da insuficiência cardíaca amiocardiopatia chagásica crônica. O sexo feminino, a presença de hipertensão arterial prévia, maiores valores médios basais depressão arterial sistólica (PAS) e pressão arterial diastólica (PAD)e maiores valores médios de idade foram associados à ocorrência de lesão renal aguda, bem como valores médios mais elevados de creatinina sérica basal. Doses médias maiores de inibidores de enzima conversora de angiotensina e de furosemida venosadurante a primeira semana de tratamento foram associadas à ocorrência lesão renal aguda. A área sob a curva ROC (Receiver Operating Characteristic) Curve (AuROC) para uso de inibidores da enzima conversora de angiotensina foi de 0,70 com p=0,001...

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: This study sought to describe the incidence of acute kidney injury (AKI) in patients with decompensated heart failure after angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors and the clinical - epidemiological profile of these patients. METHODS: This is a prospective cohort study. Patients with New York Heart Association (NYHA) class IV were included in the study. They were admitted in thewards of Internal Medicine, Hospital Santo Antonio in theperiod from 01/03/2011 to 30/10/2012. Patients with chronic kidney disease stages III, IV, V, and without complete data were excluded. Acute kidney injury was defined according to the RIFLE (Risk/Injury/Failure/Loss/End-stage) criteria. Data were analyzed using SPSS 14.0 statistical program. This project was approved by the Ethics and Research Comitee of Hospital St. Anthony. RESULTS: Of the 100 patients, the majority were male, of african descente and and had Chagas´ cardiomyopathy as a cause of heart failure. Females, the presence of previous hypertension and higher baseline mean of diastolic or sistolic pressure and higher mean values of age were associated with the occurrence of acute kidney injury, as well as higher values of baseline serum creatinine. Higher doses of angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors and furosemide were associated with the occurrence of renal injury. The area under the Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) Curve (AUROC) for angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEI) was 0.70 with p-0.001. CONCLUSION: High doses of angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors and intravenous furosemide are associated with acute kidney injury especially in the first week of introduction of angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors...

Comparacao dos criterios RIFLE, AKIN e KDIGO quanto a capacidade de predicao de mortalidade em pacientes graves / Comparison of the RIFLE, AKIN and KDIGO criteria to predict mortality in critically ill patients

Objetivo: A lesão renal aguda é uma complicação comum em pacientes gravemente enfermos, sendo os critérios RIFLE, AKIN e KDIGO utilizados para sua classificação. Esse trabalho teve como objetivo a comparação dos critérios citados quanto à capacidade de predição de mortalidade em pacientes gravemente enfermos. Métodos: Estudo de coorte prospectiva, utilizando como fonte de dados prontuários médicos. Foram incluídos todos os pacientes admitidos na unidade de terapia intensiva. Os critérios de exclusão foram tempo de internamento menor que 24 horas e doença renal crônica dialítica. Os pacientes foram acompanhados até a alta ou óbito Para análise dos dados, foram utilizados os testes t de Student, qui-quadrado, regressão logística multivariada e curva ROC. Resultados: A média de idade foi de 64 anos, com mulheres e afrodescendentes representando maioria. Segundo o RIFLE, a taxa de mortalidade foi de 17,74%, 22,58%, 24,19% e 35,48% para pacientes sem lesão renal aguda e em estágios Risk, Injury e Failure, respectivamente. Quanto ao AKIN, a taxa de mortalidade foi de 17,74%, 29,03%, 12,90% e 40,32% para pacientes sem lesão renal aguda, estágio I, estágio II e estágio III, respectivamente. Considerando o KDIGO 2012, a taxa de mortalidade foi de 17,74%, 29,03%, 11,29% e 41,94% para pacientes sem lesão renal aguda, estágio I, estágio II e estágio III, respectivamente. As três classificações apresentaram resultados de curvas ROC para mortalidade semelhantes. Conclusão: Os critérios RIFLE, AKIN e KDIGO apresentaram-se como boas ferramentas para predição de mortalidade em pacientes graves, não havendo diferença relevante entre os mesmos. .

Objective: Acute kidney injury is a common complication in critically ill patients, and the RIFLE, AKIN and KDIGO criteria are used to classify these patients. The present study's aim was to compare these criteria as predictors of mortality in critically ill patients. Methods: Prospective cohort study using medical records as the source of data. All patients admitted to the intensive care unit were included. The exclusion criteria were hospitalization for less than 24 hours and death. Patients were followed until discharge or death. Student's t test, chi-squared analysis, a multivariate logistic regression and ROC curves were used for the data analysis. Results: The mean patient age was 64 years old, and the majority of patients were women of African descent. According to RIFLE, the mortality rates were 17.74%, 22.58%, 24.19% and 35.48% for patients without acute kidney injury (AKI) in stages of Risk, Injury and Failure, respectively. For AKIN, the mortality rates were 17.74%, 29.03%, 12.90% and 40.32% for patients without AKI and at stage I, stage II and stage III, respectively. For KDIGO 2012, the mortality rates were 17.74%, 29.03%, 11.29% and 41.94% for patients without AKI and at stage I, stage II and stage III, respectively. All three classification systems showed similar ROC curves for mortality. Conclusion: The RIFLE, AKIN and KDIGO criteria were good tools for predicting mortality in critically ill patients with no significant difference between them. .